Denmark vs South Korea: Legislation Indicator based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2
Denmark
1
in 2023
South Korea
1
in 2023
Denmark rank
1st
South Korea rank
1st
Legislation Indicator based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2 over time
- Denmark
- South Korea
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 1 against 1 in South Korea, a difference of 0.
Across all 20 years both countries report, South Korea has been ahead every year.
Denmark ranks 1st and South Korea ranks 1st of 151 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher legislation indicator based on paris21 indicators on sdg 17.18.2, Denmark or South Korea?
- Denmark, at 1 against 1 in South Korea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in legislation indicator based on paris21 indicators on sdg 17.18.2 between Denmark and South Korea?
- 0, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and South Korea?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
- How do Denmark and South Korea rank globally for legislation indicator based on paris21 indicators on sdg 17.18.2?
- Denmark ranks 1st and South Korea ranks 1st of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Legislation Indicator based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2 (national statistical legislation compliance with UN Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics), existence of National Statistical Council, national statistical strategy generation, national statistical plan. Also include some other legislative aspects that foster good use of statistics eg freedom of information, privacy/transparency, good governance (eg free and fair elections).