Costa Rica vs Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China: Legislation Indicator based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2

Costa Rica
1
in 2023
Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
1
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
1st
Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China rank
1st

Legislation Indicator based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2 over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
00.20.40.60.81201920212023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 1 against 1 in Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China, a difference of 0.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China has been ahead every year.

Costa Rica ranks 1st and Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ranks 1st of 152 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China Difference Ahead
2010s 1 1 0
2020s 1 1 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher legislation indicator based on paris21 indicators on sdg 17.18.2, Costa Rica or Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China?
Costa Rica, at 1 against 1 in Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China as of 2023.
What is the difference in legislation indicator based on paris21 indicators on sdg 17.18.2 between Costa Rica and Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China?
0, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China?
5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China rank globally for legislation indicator based on paris21 indicators on sdg 17.18.2?
Costa Rica ranks 1st and Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ranks 1st of 152 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Legislation Indicator based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China: Legislation Indicator based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2. Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/legislation-indicator-based-on-paris21-indicators-on-sdg-17-18-2/costa-rica/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/legislation-indicator-based-on-paris21-indicators-on-sdg-17-18-2/costa-rica/macao-sar-china/">Costa Rica vs Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China: Legislation Indicator based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Legislation Indicator based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
152 places, 1,285 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

Based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2 (national statistical legislation compliance with UN Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics), existence of National Statistical Council, national statistical strategy generation, national statistical plan. Also include some other legislative aspects that foster good use of statistics eg freedom of information, privacy/transparency, good governance (eg free and fair elections).