Comoros vs Czechia: Legislation Indicator based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2
Legislation Indicator based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2 over time
- Comoros
- Czechia
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 1 against 1 in Czechia, a difference of 0.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Comoros ranks 1st and Czechia ranks 1st of 151 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Czechia |
| 2020s | 0.25 | 1 | 0.75 | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher legislation indicator based on paris21 indicators on sdg 17.18.2, Comoros or Czechia?
- Comoros, at 1 against 1 in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in legislation indicator based on paris21 indicators on sdg 17.18.2 between Comoros and Czechia?
- 0, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Czechia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Comoros and Czechia rank globally for legislation indicator based on paris21 indicators on sdg 17.18.2?
- Comoros ranks 1st and Czechia ranks 1st of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Legislation Indicator based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2 (national statistical legislation compliance with UN Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics), existence of National Statistical Council, national statistical strategy generation, national statistical plan. Also include some other legislative aspects that foster good use of statistics eg freedom of information, privacy/transparency, good governance (eg free and fair elections).