Latvia vs Nepal: Share of land defined as natural habitat
Latvia
67.64
in 2010
Nepal
67.36
in 2010
Latvia rank
54th
Nepal rank
56th
Share of land defined as natural habitat over time
- Latvia
- Nepal
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 67.64 against 67.36 in Nepal, a difference of 0.28.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1780 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 54th and Nepal ranks 56th of 168 countries.
Across the 24 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 21 and Nepal in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 88.23 | 77.21 | 11.02 | Latvia |
| 1790s | 87.17 | 76.81 | 10.35 | Latvia |
| 1800s | 85.99 | 76.44 | 9.56 | Latvia |
| 1810s | 84.68 | 75.96 | 8.72 | Latvia |
| 1820s | 83.47 | 75.58 | 7.89 | Latvia |
| 1830s | 82.14 | 75.09 | 7.05 | Latvia |
| 1840s | 80.69 | 74.6 | 6.09 | Latvia |
| 1850s | 79.11 | 74.05 | 5.05 | Latvia |
| 1860s | 77.33 | 73.72 | 3.62 | Latvia |
| 1870s | 75.93 | 73.3 | 2.64 | Latvia |
| 1880s | 74.41 | 72.75 | 1.66 | Latvia |
| 1890s | 72.74 | 72.19 | 0.5483 | Latvia |
| 1900s | 70.96 | 71.87 | 0.9135 | Nepal |
| 1910s | 69 | 71.01 | 2.01 | Nepal |
| 1920s | 68.46 | 68.9 | 0.4426 | Nepal |
| 1930s | 67.77 | 67.55 | 0.2154 | Latvia |
| 1940s | 67.24 | 66.07 | 1.17 | Latvia |
| 1950s | 68.29 | 64.38 | 3.91 | Latvia |
| 1960s | 66.76 | 61.33 | 5.43 | Latvia |
| 1970s | 67.64 | 62 | 5.64 | Latvia |
| 1980s | 67.94 | 61.34 | 6.59 | Latvia |
| 1990s | 69.23 | 67 | 2.24 | Latvia |
| 2000s | 68.91 | 67.11 | 1.8 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 67.64 | 67.36 | 0.2746 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of land defined as natural habitat, Latvia or Nepal?
- Latvia, at 67.64 against 67.36 in Nepal as of 2010.
- What is the difference in share of land defined as natural habitat between Latvia and Nepal?
- 0.28, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Nepal?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1780 to 2010.
- How do Latvia and Nepal rank globally for share of land defined as natural habitat?
- Latvia ranks 54th and Nepal ranks 56th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Taylor and Rising, and United Nations (2021) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of land defined as natural habitat. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Natural ecosystems include forest, grassland, savanna, and shrublands, and other classes such as peatlands and marshes. It is total land minus land that is used by humans for agriculture β either croplands or pasture β or for infrastructure and urban environments.