Georgia vs Uganda: Share of land defined as natural habitat

Georgia
47.88
in 2010
Uganda
47.81
in 2010
Georgia rank
113th
Uganda rank
114th

Share of land defined as natural habitat over time

  • Georgia
  • Uganda
020406080178018952010

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 47.88 against 47.81 in Uganda, a difference of 0.07.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1780 it was Georgia ahead.

Georgia ranks 113th and Uganda ranks 114th of 168 countries.

Across the 24 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 4 and Uganda in 20.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Uganda Difference Ahead
1780s 78.49 76.47 2.03 Georgia
1790s 77.81 76.55 1.26 Georgia
1800s 77.07 76.64 0.4378 Georgia
1810s 76.28 76.71 0.4377 Uganda
1820s 75.41 76.7 1.29 Uganda
1830s 74.47 76.69 2.22 Uganda
1840s 73.45 76.66 3.21 Uganda
1850s 72.35 76.63 4.28 Uganda
1860s 71.19 76.59 5.41 Uganda
1870s 69.93 76.39 6.46 Uganda
1880s 68.58 76.18 7.59 Uganda
1890s 67.12 75.95 8.83 Uganda
1900s 65.52 75.71 10.19 Uganda
1910s 63.77 75.43 11.66 Uganda
1920s 61.92 73.24 11.32 Uganda
1930s 60.02 70.92 10.9 Uganda
1940s 54.42 67.87 13.46 Uganda
1950s 54.9 65.11 10.22 Uganda
1960s 48.8 59.48 10.68 Uganda
1970s 48.48 56.96 8.48 Uganda
1980s 47.88 55.02 7.14 Uganda
1990s 48.48 51.63 3.15 Uganda
2000s 47.57 50.26 2.7 Uganda
2010s 47.88 47.81 0.0709 Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher share of land defined as natural habitat, Georgia or Uganda?
Georgia, at 47.88 against 47.81 in Uganda as of 2010.
What is the difference in share of land defined as natural habitat between Georgia and Uganda?
0.07, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Uganda?
24 years are reported by both, from 1780 to 2010.
How do Georgia and Uganda rank globally for share of land defined as natural habitat?
Georgia ranks 113th and Uganda ranks 114th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Taylor and Rising, and United Nations (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of land defined as natural habitat. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Uganda: Share of land defined as natural habitat. Statizoid, drawing on Taylor and Rising, and United Nations (2021) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/land-natural-share/georgia/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/land-natural-share/georgia/uganda/">Georgia vs Uganda: Share of land defined as natural habitat</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Share of land defined as natural habitat
Source
Taylor and Rising, and United Nations (2021) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
168 places, 4,032 data points, 1780–2010
Last refreshed

Natural ecosystems include forest, grassland, savanna, and shrublands, and other classes such as peatlands and marshes. It is total land minus land that is used by humans for agriculture – either croplands or pasture – or for infrastructure and urban environments.