Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Burkina Faso: Share of land defined as natural habitat
Bosnia and Herzegovina
61.25
in 2010
Burkina Faso
60.78
in 2010
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
75th
Burkina Faso rank
78th
Share of land defined as natural habitat over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Burkina Faso
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 61.25 against 60.78 in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.47.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 1780 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 75th and Burkina Faso ranks 78th of 168 countries.
Across the 24 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Burkina Faso in 23.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Burkina Faso | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 83.86 | 89.56 | 5.7 | Burkina Faso |
| 1790s | 83.75 | 89.43 | 5.68 | Burkina Faso |
| 1800s | 83.64 | 89.3 | 5.66 | Burkina Faso |
| 1810s | 83.52 | 89.16 | 5.64 | Burkina Faso |
| 1820s | 83.12 | 88.98 | 5.86 | Burkina Faso |
| 1830s | 82.7 | 88.79 | 6.09 | Burkina Faso |
| 1840s | 82.27 | 88.59 | 6.32 | Burkina Faso |
| 1850s | 81.64 | 88.39 | 6.75 | Burkina Faso |
| 1860s | 81.01 | 88.18 | 7.17 | Burkina Faso |
| 1870s | 79.58 | 87.84 | 8.26 | Burkina Faso |
| 1880s | 78.09 | 87.5 | 9.41 | Burkina Faso |
| 1890s | 76.49 | 87.14 | 10.65 | Burkina Faso |
| 1900s | 74.75 | 86.77 | 12.02 | Burkina Faso |
| 1910s | 72.77 | 86.39 | 13.63 | Burkina Faso |
| 1920s | 69.71 | 83.9 | 14.19 | Burkina Faso |
| 1930s | 66.17 | 80.98 | 14.81 | Burkina Faso |
| 1940s | 62.31 | 77.55 | 15.24 | Burkina Faso |
| 1950s | 57.64 | 73.99 | 16.35 | Burkina Faso |
| 1960s | 51.4 | 70.06 | 18.66 | Burkina Faso |
| 1970s | 52.38 | 73.18 | 20.8 | Burkina Faso |
| 1980s | 53.22 | 71.25 | 18.03 | Burkina Faso |
| 1990s | 53.52 | 68.48 | 14.96 | Burkina Faso |
| 2000s | 59.48 | 64.28 | 4.79 | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 61.25 | 60.78 | 0.4776 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of land defined as natural habitat, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Burkina Faso?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 61.25 against 60.78 in Burkina Faso as of 2010.
- What is the difference in share of land defined as natural habitat between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Burkina Faso?
- 0.47, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Burkina Faso?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1780 to 2010.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Burkina Faso rank globally for share of land defined as natural habitat?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 75th and Burkina Faso ranks 78th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Taylor and Rising, and United Nations (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of land defined as natural habitat. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Natural ecosystems include forest, grassland, savanna, and shrublands, and other classes such as peatlands and marshes. It is total land minus land that is used by humans for agriculture – either croplands or pasture – or for infrastructure and urban environments.