Which has higher land area in square kilometers, per unit of gdp, Malta or Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?

Sint Maarten (Dutch part), at 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in Malta as of 2023.

What is the difference in land area in square kilometers, per unit of gdp between Malta and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP, with Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?

13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Land area in square kilometers, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Malta vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Land area in square kilometers, per unit of GDP

Malta

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Sint Maarten (Dutch part)

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Malta rank

205th

Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank

202nd

Land area in square kilometers, per unit of GDP over time

Malta
Sint Maarten (Dutch part)

How they compare

Sint Maarten (Dutch part) currently reports 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in Malta, a difference of 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP.

That makes Sint Maarten (Dutch part)'s figure about 1.4 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ahead.

Malta ranks 205th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 202nd of 210 countries.

Sint Maarten (Dutch part) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Malta	Sint Maarten (Dutch part)	Difference	Ahead
2010s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
2020s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Sint Maarten (Dutch part)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land area in square kilometers, per unit of gdp, Malta or Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?: Sint Maarten (Dutch part), at 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in land area in square kilometers, per unit of gdp between Malta and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?: 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP, with Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?: 13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
How do Malta and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank globally for land area in square kilometers, per unit of gdp?: Malta ranks 205th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 202nd of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Land area in square kilometers, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Land area in square kilometers, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/land-area-in-square-kilometers-per-unit-of-gdp/malta/sint-maarten-dutch-part/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/land-area-in-square-kilometers-per-unit-of-gdp/malta/sint-maarten-dutch-part/">Malta vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Land area in square kilometers, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Land area in square kilometers, per unit of GDP
Unit: sq. km per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 210 places, 10,904 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 13 September 2026

Land area in square kilometers divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.