Curacao vs Nauru: Land area in hectares, per unit of GDP
Curacao
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Nauru
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Curacao rank
176th
Nauru rank
179th
Land area in hectares, per unit of GDP over time
- Curacao
- Nauru
How they compare
Curacao currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Nauru, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.
That makes Curacao's figure about 1.1 times Nauru's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Nauru ahead.
Curacao ranks 176th and Nauru ranks 179th of 210 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Curacao averaged higher in 1 and Nauru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Curacao | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Nauru |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Curacao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher land area in hectares, per unit of gdp, Curacao or Nauru?
- Curacao, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Nauru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in land area in hectares, per unit of gdp between Curacao and Nauru?
- 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Curacao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Nauru?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
- How do Curacao and Nauru rank globally for land area in hectares, per unit of gdp?
- Curacao ranks 176th and Nauru ranks 179th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Land area in hectares, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Land area in hectares divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.