Aruba vs Belgium: Land area in hectares, per unit of GDP
Aruba
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Belgium
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Aruba rank
193rd
Belgium rank
194th
Land area in hectares, per unit of GDP over time
- Aruba
- Belgium
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Belgium, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Aruba ranks 193rd and Belgium ranks 194th of 210 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 2 and Belgium in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Belgium | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Belgium |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Aruba |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher land area in hectares, per unit of gdp, Aruba or Belgium?
- Aruba, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Belgium as of 2023.
- What is the difference in land area in hectares, per unit of gdp between Aruba and Belgium?
- 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Belgium?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Aruba and Belgium rank globally for land area in hectares, per unit of gdp?
- Aruba ranks 193rd and Belgium ranks 194th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Land area in hectares, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Land area in hectares divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.