Papua New Guinea vs Rwanda: Land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like.., per

Papua New Guinea
0.2391 animals per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Rwanda
0.2632 animals per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Papua New Guinea rank
145th
Rwanda rank
142nd

Land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like.., per over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Rwanda
02.557.510196119922024

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.2632 animals per US$ of GDP against 0.2391 animals per US$ of GDP in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.0241 animals per US$ of GDP.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 145th and Rwanda ranks 142nd of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 5 and Rwanda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 8.19 animals per US$ of GDP 5.39 animals per US$ of GDP 2.8 animals per US$ of GDP Papua New Guinea
1970s 2.99 animals per US$ of GDP 2.99 animals per US$ of GDP 0.0006 animals per US$ of GDP Papua New Guinea
1980s 2.31 animals per US$ of GDP 1.1 animals per US$ of GDP 1.21 animals per US$ of GDP Papua New Guinea
1990s 1.94 animals per US$ of GDP 1.56 animals per US$ of GDP 0.3815 animals per US$ of GDP Papua New Guinea
2000s 1.73 animals per US$ of GDP 1.19 animals per US$ of GDP 0.5381 animals per US$ of GDP Papua New Guinea
2010s 0.3716 animals per US$ of GDP 0.7435 animals per US$ of GDP 0.372 animals per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2020s 0.2641 animals per US$ of GDP 0.2936 animals per US$ of GDP 0.0295 animals per US$ of GDP Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like.., per, Papua New Guinea or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 0.2632 animals per US$ of GDP against 0.2391 animals per US$ of GDP in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like.., per between Papua New Guinea and Rwanda?
0.0241 animals per US$ of GDP, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Rwanda?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Papua New Guinea and Rwanda rank globally for land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like.., per?
Papua New Guinea ranks 145th and Rwanda ranks 142nd of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like.., per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Rwanda: Land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like.., per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/land-animals-slaughtered-if-all-countries-produced-meat-like-per-unit-of-gdp/papua-new-guinea/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/land-animals-slaughtered-if-all-countries-produced-meat-like-per-unit-of-gdp/papua-new-guinea/rwanda/">Papua New Guinea vs Rwanda: Land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like.., per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like.., per unit of GDP
Unit
animals per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 10,319 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like.. divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.