Nauru vs Sao Tome and Principe: Land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like.., per

Nauru
30.41 animals per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
27.5 animals per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Nauru rank
9th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
10th

Land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like.., per over time

  • Nauru
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0100200300400197019972024

How they compare

Nauru currently reports 30.41 animals per US$ of GDP against 27.5 animals per US$ of GDP in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 2.91 animals per US$ of GDP.

That makes Nauru's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Nauru ahead.

Nauru ranks 9th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 10th of 189 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nauru Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1970s 80.63 animals per US$ of GDP 91.16 animals per US$ of GDP 10.53 animals per US$ of GDP Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 74.29 animals per US$ of GDP 110.08 animals per US$ of GDP 35.79 animals per US$ of GDP Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 104.83 animals per US$ of GDP 212.71 animals per US$ of GDP 107.88 animals per US$ of GDP Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 171.78 animals per US$ of GDP 309.15 animals per US$ of GDP 137.37 animals per US$ of GDP Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 58.42 animals per US$ of GDP 118.17 animals per US$ of GDP 59.75 animals per US$ of GDP Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 32.89 animals per US$ of GDP 54.62 animals per US$ of GDP 21.73 animals per US$ of GDP Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like.., per, Nauru or Sao Tome and Principe?
Nauru, at 30.41 animals per US$ of GDP against 27.5 animals per US$ of GDP in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2024.
What is the difference in land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like.., per between Nauru and Sao Tome and Principe?
2.91 animals per US$ of GDP, with Nauru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Sao Tome and Principe?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Nauru and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like.., per?
Nauru ranks 9th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 10th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like.., per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nauru vs Sao Tome and Principe: Land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like.., per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/land-animals-slaughtered-if-all-countries-produced-meat-like-per-unit-of-gdp/naoero/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/land-animals-slaughtered-if-all-countries-produced-meat-like-per-unit-of-gdp/naoero/sao-tome-and-principe/">Nauru vs Sao Tome and Principe: Land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like.., per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like.., per unit of GDP
Unit
animals per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 10,319 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like.. divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.