Brazil vs Equatorial Guinea: Land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like.., per

Brazil
0.1166 animals per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea
0.1119 animals per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Brazil rank
162nd
Equatorial Guinea rank
163rd

Land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like.., per over time

  • Brazil
  • Equatorial Guinea
0204060196119922024

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0.1166 animals per US$ of GDP against 0.1119 animals per US$ of GDP in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0047 animals per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Brazil ranks 162nd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 163rd of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3604 animals per US$ of GDP 19.1 animals per US$ of GDP 18.74 animals per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0.2193 animals per US$ of GDP 22.43 animals per US$ of GDP 22.21 animals per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.1978 animals per US$ of GDP 42.53 animals per US$ of GDP 42.33 animals per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.1734 animals per US$ of GDP 15.22 animals per US$ of GDP 15.05 animals per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.1893 animals per US$ of GDP 0.7618 animals per US$ of GDP 0.5724 animals per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.0992 animals per US$ of GDP 0.1099 animals per US$ of GDP 0.0107 animals per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.1293 animals per US$ of GDP 0.1256 animals per US$ of GDP 0.0038 animals per US$ of GDP Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like.., per, Brazil or Equatorial Guinea?
Brazil, at 0.1166 animals per US$ of GDP against 0.1119 animals per US$ of GDP in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like.., per between Brazil and Equatorial Guinea?
0.0047 animals per US$ of GDP, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Equatorial Guinea?
61 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Brazil and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like.., per?
Brazil ranks 162nd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 163rd of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like.., per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Equatorial Guinea: Land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like.., per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/land-animals-slaughtered-if-all-countries-produced-meat-like-per-unit-of-gdp/brazil/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/land-animals-slaughtered-if-all-countries-produced-meat-like-per-unit-of-gdp/brazil/equatorial-guinea/">Brazil vs Equatorial Guinea: Land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like.., per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like.., per unit of GDP
Unit
animals per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 10,319 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like.. divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.