New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: Land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like..

New Caledonia
1.25 % change on previous year
in 2024
Zimbabwe
1.15 % change on previous year
in 2024
New Caledonia rank
102nd
Zimbabwe rank
105th

Land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like.. over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Zimbabwe
-50-250255075196219932024

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 1.25 % change on previous year against 1.15 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.1 % change on previous year.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 35 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 102nd and Zimbabwe ranks 105th of 199 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 3.13 % change on previous year 2.93 % change on previous year 0.202 % change on previous year New Caledonia
1970s 4.14 % change on previous year 3.74 % change on previous year 0.3999 % change on previous year New Caledonia
1980s 6.25 % change on previous year 4.49 % change on previous year 1.76 % change on previous year New Caledonia
1990s 3.43 % change on previous year 5.42 % change on previous year 2 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2000s -5.73 % change on previous year 9.7 % change on previous year 15.43 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2010s 2.67 % change on previous year 3.18 % change on previous year 0.5076 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2020s 1.12 % change on previous year -1.26 % change on previous year 2.39 % change on previous year New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like.., New Caledonia or Zimbabwe?
New Caledonia, at 1.25 % change on previous year against 1.15 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like.. between New Caledonia and Zimbabwe?
0.1 % change on previous year, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do New Caledonia and Zimbabwe rank globally for land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like..?
New Caledonia ranks 102nd and Zimbabwe ranks 105th of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like.., annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: Land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like... Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/land-animals-slaughtered-if-all-countries-produced-meat-like-annual-growth-rate/new-caledonia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/land-animals-slaughtered-if-all-countries-produced-meat-like-annual-growth-rate/new-caledonia/zimbabwe/">New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: Land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like..</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like.., annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 11,363 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Land animals slaughtered if all countries produced meat like... Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.