Nicaragua vs Palestine, State of: Justified Political Positions Score
Nicaragua
-1.96
in 2025
Palestine, State of
-1.95
in 1948
Nicaragua rank
169th
Palestine, State of rank
168th
Justified Political Positions Score over time
- Nicaragua
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Palestine, State of currently reports -1.95 against -1.96 in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.01.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Palestine, State of ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 169th and Palestine, State of ranks 168th of 175 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 2 and Palestine, State of in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | -2.38 | -1.95 | 0.426 | Palestine, State of |
| 1920s | -1.18 | -1.95 | 0.7686 | Nicaragua |
| 1930s | -1.78 | -1.95 | 0.1668 | Nicaragua |
| 1940s | -2.05 | -1.95 | 0.103 | Palestine, State of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher justified political positions score, Nicaragua or Palestine, State of?
- Palestine, State of, at -1.95 against -1.96 in Nicaragua as of 1948.
- What is the difference in justified political positions score between Nicaragua and Palestine, State of?
- 0.01, with Palestine, State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Palestine, State of?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 1948.
- How do Nicaragua and Palestine, State of rank globally for justified political positions score?
- Nicaragua ranks 169th and Palestine, State of ranks 168th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Justified Political Positions Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites provide complex, nuanced, and complete justifications for their views when considering important policy changes.