Nepal vs Peru: Justified Political Positions Score

Nepal
-0.203
in 2025
Peru
-0.267
in 2025
Nepal rank
133rd
Peru rank
136th

Justified Political Positions Score over time

  • Nepal
  • Peru
-4-3-2-101190019622025

How they compare

Nepal currently reports -0.203 against -0.267 in Peru, a difference of 0.064.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Peru ahead.

Nepal ranks 133rd and Peru ranks 136th of 175 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 4 and Peru in 9.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal Peru Difference Ahead
1900s -3.61 -0.816 2.79 Peru
1910s -3.61 -0.816 2.79 Peru
1920s -3.61 -1.33 2.28 Peru
1930s -3.61 -0.9258 2.68 Peru
1940s -3.61 -1.25 2.36 Peru
1950s 0.2076 -1.26 1.47 Nepal
1960s -0.4091 -0.2724 0.1367 Peru
1970s -0.673 -0.905 0.232 Nepal
1980s -0.3418 0.874 1.22 Peru
1990s 1.21 -0.0058 1.22 Nepal
2000s 0.9102 1.07 0.1595 Peru
2010s 0.8128 0.8356 0.0228 Peru
2020s -0.1332 -0.2235 0.0903 Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher justified political positions score, Nepal or Peru?
Nepal, at -0.203 against -0.267 in Peru as of 2025.
What is the difference in justified political positions score between Nepal and Peru?
0.064, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Peru?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Nepal and Peru rank globally for justified political positions score?
Nepal ranks 133rd and Peru ranks 136th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Justified Political Positions Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Justified Political Positions Score
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,802 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which political elites provide complex, nuanced, and complete justifications for their views when considering important policy changes.