Namibia vs Vietnam: Justified Political Positions Score

Namibia
0.551
in 2025
Vietnam
0.58
in 2025
Namibia rank
90th
Vietnam rank
87th

Justified Political Positions Score over time

  • Namibia
  • Vietnam
-1012190019622025

How they compare

Vietnam currently reports 0.58 against 0.551 in Namibia, a difference of 0.029.

That makes Vietnam's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Vietnam ahead.

Namibia ranks 90th and Vietnam ranks 87th of 175 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 1 and Vietnam in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Vietnam Difference Ahead
1970s -0.632 0.8095 1.44 Vietnam
1980s -0.146 1.18 1.33 Vietnam
1990s 1.13 1.32 0.192 Vietnam
2000s 1.13 1.23 0.1008 Vietnam
2010s 0.9693 0.8862 0.0831 Namibia
2020s 0.551 0.737 0.186 Vietnam

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher justified political positions score, Namibia or Vietnam?
Vietnam, at 0.58 against 0.551 in Namibia as of 2025.
What is the difference in justified political positions score between Namibia and Vietnam?
0.029, with Vietnam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Vietnam?
50 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2025.
How do Namibia and Vietnam rank globally for justified political positions score?
Namibia ranks 90th and Vietnam ranks 87th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Justified Political Positions Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Justified Political Positions Score
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,802 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which political elites provide complex, nuanced, and complete justifications for their views when considering important policy changes.