Moldova vs Suriname: Justified Political Positions Score
Moldova
1.6
in 2025
Suriname
1.66
in 2025
Moldova rank
38th
Suriname rank
35th
Justified Political Positions Score over time
- Moldova
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 1.66 against 1.6 in Moldova, a difference of 0.06.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 106 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Suriname ahead.
Moldova ranks 38th and Suriname ranks 35th of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Moldova averaged higher in 4 and Suriname in 7.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | -1.41 | 0.07 | 1.48 | Suriname |
| 1910s | -0.4555 | 0.07 | 0.5255 | Suriname |
| 1940s | 0.2658 | 0.1136 | 0.1522 | Moldova |
| 1950s | 0.2656 | 0.8645 | 0.5989 | Suriname |
| 1960s | 0.292 | 1.14 | 0.852 | Suriname |
| 1970s | 0.292 | 1.14 | 0.852 | Suriname |
| 1980s | 0.7613 | -0.2732 | 1.03 | Moldova |
| 1990s | 0.1869 | 1.1 | 0.9171 | Suriname |
| 2000s | 0.0195 | 1.1 | 1.08 | Suriname |
| 2010s | 0.9363 | 0.5596 | 0.3767 | Moldova |
| 2020s | 1.75 | 1.44 | 0.3145 | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher justified political positions score, Moldova or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 1.66 against 1.6 in Moldova as of 2025.
- What is the difference in justified political positions score between Moldova and Suriname?
- 0.06, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Suriname?
- 106 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Moldova and Suriname rank globally for justified political positions score?
- Moldova ranks 38th and Suriname ranks 35th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Justified Political Positions Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites provide complex, nuanced, and complete justifications for their views when considering important policy changes.