Maldives vs Rwanda: Justified Political Positions Score
Maldives
1.07
in 2025
Rwanda
1.04
in 2025
Maldives rank
64th
Rwanda rank
66th
Justified Political Positions Score over time
- Maldives
- Rwanda
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 1.07 against 1.04 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.03.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 110 shared years of data; in 1916 it was Maldives ahead.
Maldives ranks 64th and Rwanda ranks 66th of 175 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Maldives averaged higher in 6 and Rwanda in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Maldives | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | -2.74 | -2.91 | 0.172 | Maldives |
| 1920s | -2.74 | -2.91 | 0.172 | Maldives |
| 1930s | -1.51 | -2.91 | 1.41 | Maldives |
| 1940s | -1.2 | -2.91 | 1.71 | Maldives |
| 1950s | -1.2 | -2.91 | 1.71 | Maldives |
| 1960s | -1.2 | -1.08 | 0.1186 | Rwanda |
| 1970s | -1.16 | -0.832 | 0.329 | Rwanda |
| 1980s | -0.828 | -0.832 | 0.004 | Maldives |
| 1990s | -0.828 | -0.222 | 0.606 | Rwanda |
| 2000s | -0.2831 | 0.7468 | 1.03 | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0.3671 | 0.9707 | 0.6036 | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0.8758 | 1.04 | 0.1692 | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher justified political positions score, Maldives or Rwanda?
- Maldives, at 1.07 against 1.04 in Rwanda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in justified political positions score between Maldives and Rwanda?
- 0.03, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Rwanda?
- 110 years are reported by both, from 1916 to 2025.
- How do Maldives and Rwanda rank globally for justified political positions score?
- Maldives ranks 64th and Rwanda ranks 66th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Justified Political Positions Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites provide complex, nuanced, and complete justifications for their views when considering important policy changes.