Lebanon vs Libya: Justified Political Positions Score

Lebanon
0.978
in 2025
Libya
1.04
in 2025
Lebanon rank
69th
Libya rank
68th

Justified Political Positions Score over time

  • Lebanon
  • Libya
-2-101191819712025

How they compare

Libya currently reports 1.04 against 0.978 in Lebanon, a difference of 0.062.

That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times Lebanon's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 83 shared years of data; in 1934 it was Lebanon ahead.

Lebanon ranks 69th and Libya ranks 68th of 175 countries.

Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 10 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lebanon Libya Difference Ahead
1930s -0.889 -2.32 1.43 Lebanon
1940s -0.889 -2.32 1.43 Lebanon
1950s -0.3548 -2.06 1.71 Lebanon
1960s -0.041 -1.99 1.95 Lebanon
1970s 0.1514 -1.09 1.24 Lebanon
1980s 0.44 -1.09 1.53 Lebanon
1990s 0.4718 -1.09 1.56 Lebanon
2000s 0.6546 -1.09 1.74 Lebanon
2010s 1.04 0.1647 0.8747 Lebanon
2020s 0.6507 0.5513 0.0993 Lebanon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher justified political positions score, Lebanon or Libya?
Libya, at 1.04 against 0.978 in Lebanon as of 2025.
What is the difference in justified political positions score between Lebanon and Libya?
0.062, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Libya?
83 years are reported by both, from 1934 to 2025.
How do Lebanon and Libya rank globally for justified political positions score?
Lebanon ranks 69th and Libya ranks 68th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Justified Political Positions Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Justified Political Positions Score
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,802 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which political elites provide complex, nuanced, and complete justifications for their views when considering important policy changes.