India vs Mongolia: Justified Political Positions Score
India
0.67
in 2025
Mongolia
0.691
in 2025
India rank
86th
Mongolia rank
85th
Justified Political Positions Score over time
- India
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0.691 against 0.67 in India, a difference of 0.021.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 115 shared years of data; in 1911 it was India ahead.
India ranks 86th and Mongolia ranks 85th of 175 countries.
India has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | -0.637 | -2.16 | 1.53 | India |
| 1920s | -0.637 | -1.46 | 0.823 | India |
| 1930s | -0.419 | -1.55 | 1.14 | India |
| 1940s | 0.7818 | -1.45 | 2.23 | India |
| 1950s | 1.73 | -1.36 | 3.09 | India |
| 1960s | 1.73 | -1.43 | 3.15 | India |
| 1970s | 1.76 | -1.43 | 3.18 | India |
| 1980s | 2.39 | -1.43 | 3.81 | India |
| 1990s | 2.39 | 0.7842 | 1.6 | India |
| 2000s | 2.4 | 1 | 1.39 | India |
| 2010s | 1.54 | 0.6058 | 0.9352 | India |
| 2020s | 0.5747 | 0.3125 | 0.2622 | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher justified political positions score, India or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 0.691 against 0.67 in India as of 2025.
- What is the difference in justified political positions score between India and Mongolia?
- 0.021, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Mongolia?
- 115 years are reported by both, from 1911 to 2025.
- How do India and Mongolia rank globally for justified political positions score?
- India ranks 86th and Mongolia ranks 85th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Justified Political Positions Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites provide complex, nuanced, and complete justifications for their views when considering important policy changes.