Haiti vs Malawi: Justified Political Positions Score
Haiti
0.79
in 2025
Malawi
0.774
in 2025
Haiti rank
79th
Malawi rank
81st
Justified Political Positions Score over time
- Haiti
- Malawi
How they compare
Haiti currently reports 0.79 against 0.774 in Malawi, a difference of 0.016.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Haiti ahead.
Haiti ranks 79th and Malawi ranks 81st of 175 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Haiti averaged higher in 7 and Malawi in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | -0.084 | -2.75 | 2.67 | Haiti |
| 1910s | -0.084 | -2.75 | 2.67 | Haiti |
| 1920s | -0.084 | -2.75 | 2.67 | Haiti |
| 1930s | -0.084 | -2.75 | 2.67 | Haiti |
| 1940s | -0.084 | -2.67 | 2.58 | Haiti |
| 1950s | -0.292 | -2.48 | 2.18 | Haiti |
| 1960s | -1.12 | -1.13 | 0.0084 | Haiti |
| 1970s | -1.12 | -0.299 | 0.825 | Malawi |
| 1980s | -0.8147 | -0.299 | 0.5157 | Malawi |
| 1990s | 0.1926 | 0.4029 | 0.2103 | Malawi |
| 2000s | 0.792 | 1.27 | 0.4746 | Malawi |
| 2010s | 0.7803 | 0.8221 | 0.0418 | Malawi |
| 2020s | 0.7917 | 0.8927 | 0.101 | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher justified political positions score, Haiti or Malawi?
- Haiti, at 0.79 against 0.774 in Malawi as of 2025.
- What is the difference in justified political positions score between Haiti and Malawi?
- 0.016, with Haiti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Malawi?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Haiti and Malawi rank globally for justified political positions score?
- Haiti ranks 79th and Malawi ranks 81st of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Justified Political Positions Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites provide complex, nuanced, and complete justifications for their views when considering important policy changes.