Ghana vs Moldova: Justified Political Positions Score
Ghana
1.6
in 2025
Moldova
1.6
in 2025
Ghana rank
39th
Moldova rank
38th
Justified Political Positions Score over time
- Ghana
- Moldova
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 1.6 against 1.6 in Ghana, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1902 it was Ghana ahead.
Ghana ranks 39th and Moldova ranks 38th of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 4 and Moldova in 7.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | -1.45 | -1.29 | 0.1679 | Moldova |
| 1910s | -1.45 | -0.4555 | 0.9985 | Moldova |
| 1940s | -0.4695 | 0.2658 | 0.7353 | Moldova |
| 1950s | 0.621 | 0.2656 | 0.3554 | Ghana |
| 1960s | 0.1271 | 0.292 | 0.1649 | Moldova |
| 1970s | -0.5178 | 0.292 | 0.8098 | Moldova |
| 1980s | -1.18 | 0.7613 | 1.94 | Moldova |
| 1990s | 0.5336 | 0.1869 | 0.3467 | Ghana |
| 2000s | 2.19 | 0.0195 | 2.17 | Ghana |
| 2010s | 1.72 | 0.9363 | 0.7817 | Ghana |
| 2020s | 1.58 | 1.75 | 0.1703 | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher justified political positions score, Ghana or Moldova?
- Moldova, at 1.6 against 1.6 in Ghana as of 2025.
- What is the difference in justified political positions score between Ghana and Moldova?
- 0, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Moldova?
- 104 years are reported by both, from 1902 to 2025.
- How do Ghana and Moldova rank globally for justified political positions score?
- Ghana ranks 39th and Moldova ranks 38th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Justified Political Positions Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites provide complex, nuanced, and complete justifications for their views when considering important policy changes.