Germany vs Luxembourg: Justified Political Positions Score
Germany
3.74
in 2025
Luxembourg
3.25
in 2025
Germany rank
1st
Luxembourg rank
3rd
Justified Political Positions Score over time
- Germany
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Germany currently reports 3.74 against 3.25 in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.49.
That makes Germany's figure about 1.1 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 80 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Germany ahead.
Germany ranks 1st and Luxembourg ranks 3rd of 175 countries.
Across the 9 decades both report, Germany averaged higher in 8 and Luxembourg in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Germany | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | -0.148 | -0.312 | 0.164 | Germany |
| 1910s | -0.1672 | -1.21 | 1.04 | Germany |
| 1920s | 0.9335 | 0.222 | 0.7115 | Germany |
| 1930s | -1.08 | 0.222 | 1.3 | Luxembourg |
| 1940s | -1.89 | -2.25 | 0.3606 | Germany |
| 1990s | 3.74 | 3.25 | 0.487 | Germany |
| 2000s | 3.74 | 3.25 | 0.487 | Germany |
| 2010s | 3.74 | 3.25 | 0.487 | Germany |
| 2020s | 3.74 | 3.26 | 0.487 | Germany |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher justified political positions score, Germany or Luxembourg?
- Germany, at 3.74 against 3.25 in Luxembourg as of 2025.
- What is the difference in justified political positions score between Germany and Luxembourg?
- 0.49, with Germany ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Luxembourg?
- 80 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Germany and Luxembourg rank globally for justified political positions score?
- Germany ranks 1st and Luxembourg ranks 3rd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Justified Political Positions Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites provide complex, nuanced, and complete justifications for their views when considering important policy changes.