Georgia vs Morocco: Justified Political Positions Score
Georgia
1.1
in 2025
Morocco
1.06
in 2025
Georgia rank
62nd
Morocco rank
65th
Justified Political Positions Score over time
- Georgia
- Morocco
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 1.1 against 1.06 in Morocco, a difference of 0.04.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 114 shared years of data; in 1912 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 62nd and Morocco ranks 65th of 175 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 9 and Morocco in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | -0.3939 | -2.38 | 1.99 | Georgia |
| 1920s | 0.5519 | -2.38 | 2.93 | Georgia |
| 1930s | 0.2737 | -2.38 | 2.65 | Georgia |
| 1940s | 0.2658 | -1.65 | 1.91 | Georgia |
| 1950s | 0.2656 | -1.05 | 1.32 | Georgia |
| 1960s | 0.292 | -0.5 | 0.792 | Georgia |
| 1970s | 0.292 | -0.0302 | 0.3222 | Georgia |
| 1980s | 0.7613 | 0.022 | 0.7393 | Georgia |
| 1990s | -0.4609 | 0.0465 | 0.5074 | Morocco |
| 2000s | 0.3104 | 0.9555 | 0.6451 | Morocco |
| 2010s | 0.875 | 1.22 | 0.3493 | Morocco |
| 2020s | 1.26 | 1.06 | 0.1993 | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher justified political positions score, Georgia or Morocco?
- Georgia, at 1.1 against 1.06 in Morocco as of 2025.
- What is the difference in justified political positions score between Georgia and Morocco?
- 0.04, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Morocco?
- 114 years are reported by both, from 1912 to 2025.
- How do Georgia and Morocco rank globally for justified political positions score?
- Georgia ranks 62nd and Morocco ranks 65th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Justified Political Positions Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites provide complex, nuanced, and complete justifications for their views when considering important policy changes.