Gabon vs Madagascar: Justified Political Positions Score
Gabon
0.004
in 2025
Madagascar
0
in 2025
Gabon rank
121st
Madagascar rank
122nd
Justified Political Positions Score over time
- Gabon
- Madagascar
How they compare
Gabon currently reports 0.004 against 0 in Madagascar, a difference of 0.004.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 116 shared years of data; in 1910 it was Madagascar ahead.
Gabon ranks 121st and Madagascar ranks 122nd of 175 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Gabon averaged higher in 9 and Madagascar in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gabon | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | -2.67 | -2.42 | 0.254 | Madagascar |
| 1920s | -2.67 | -2.42 | 0.254 | Madagascar |
| 1930s | -2.67 | -2.42 | 0.254 | Madagascar |
| 1940s | -2.12 | -2.42 | 0.2981 | Gabon |
| 1950s | -0.368 | -2.4 | 2.03 | Gabon |
| 1960s | 0.9107 | -0.4307 | 1.34 | Gabon |
| 1970s | 0.948 | -0.8573 | 1.81 | Gabon |
| 1980s | 0.948 | -1.65 | 2.6 | Gabon |
| 1990s | 1.88 | -0.592 | 2.47 | Gabon |
| 2000s | 1.98 | 0.1309 | 1.85 | Gabon |
| 2010s | 1.39 | -0.1394 | 1.53 | Gabon |
| 2020s | 0.0535 | 0 | 0.0535 | Gabon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher justified political positions score, Gabon or Madagascar?
- Gabon, at 0.004 against 0 in Madagascar as of 2025.
- What is the difference in justified political positions score between Gabon and Madagascar?
- 0.004, with Gabon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Madagascar?
- 116 years are reported by both, from 1910 to 2025.
- How do Gabon and Madagascar rank globally for justified political positions score?
- Gabon ranks 121st and Madagascar ranks 122nd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Justified Political Positions Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites provide complex, nuanced, and complete justifications for their views when considering important policy changes.