Gabon vs Iran: Justified Political Positions Score
Gabon
0.004
in 2025
Iran
0.038
in 2025
Gabon rank
121st
Iran rank
118th
Justified Political Positions Score over time
- Gabon
- Iran
How they compare
Iran currently reports 0.038 against 0.004 in Gabon, a difference of 0.034.
That makes Iran's figure about 9.5 times Gabon's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 116 shared years of data; in 1910 it was Iran ahead.
Gabon ranks 121st and Iran ranks 118th of 175 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Gabon averaged higher in 6 and Iran in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gabon | Iran | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | -2.67 | -0.374 | 2.3 | Iran |
| 1920s | -2.67 | -1.35 | 1.32 | Iran |
| 1930s | -2.67 | -1.83 | 0.839 | Iran |
| 1940s | -2.12 | -0.5277 | 1.59 | Iran |
| 1950s | -0.368 | -0.4599 | 0.0919 | Gabon |
| 1960s | 0.9107 | -1.33 | 2.24 | Gabon |
| 1970s | 0.948 | -1.33 | 2.28 | Gabon |
| 1980s | 0.948 | 0.7959 | 0.1521 | Gabon |
| 1990s | 1.88 | 1.97 | 0.089 | Iran |
| 2000s | 1.98 | 2.26 | 0.2785 | Iran |
| 2010s | 1.39 | 1.11 | 0.2833 | Gabon |
| 2020s | 0.0535 | -0.237 | 0.2905 | Gabon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher justified political positions score, Gabon or Iran?
- Iran, at 0.038 against 0.004 in Gabon as of 2025.
- What is the difference in justified political positions score between Gabon and Iran?
- 0.034, with Iran ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Iran?
- 116 years are reported by both, from 1910 to 2025.
- How do Gabon and Iran rank globally for justified political positions score?
- Gabon ranks 121st and Iran ranks 118th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Justified Political Positions Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites provide complex, nuanced, and complete justifications for their views when considering important policy changes.