Fiji vs Vanuatu: Justified Political Positions Score

Fiji
1.23
in 2025
Vanuatu
1.26
in 2025
Fiji rank
55th
Vanuatu rank
52nd

Justified Political Positions Score over time

  • Fiji
  • Vanuatu
-2-1012190019622025

How they compare

Vanuatu currently reports 1.26 against 1.23 in Fiji, a difference of 0.03.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Fiji ahead.

Fiji ranks 55th and Vanuatu ranks 52nd of 175 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 8 and Vanuatu in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Fiji Vanuatu Difference Ahead
1900s -0.597 -2.4 1.8 Fiji
1910s -0.597 -2.4 1.8 Fiji
1920s -0.597 -2.4 1.8 Fiji
1930s -0.597 -2.4 1.8 Fiji
1940s -0.597 -2.4 1.8 Fiji
1950s 0.0785 -2.4 2.48 Fiji
1960s 0.368 -2.4 2.77 Fiji
1970s 1.54 -2.4 3.94 Fiji
1980s 0.5087 0.649 0.1403 Vanuatu
1990s 0.5598 0.649 0.0892 Vanuatu
2000s -0.0524 0.928 0.9804 Vanuatu
2010s 0.2205 0.9844 0.7639 Vanuatu
2020s 1.01 1.45 0.4452 Vanuatu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher justified political positions score, Fiji or Vanuatu?
Vanuatu, at 1.26 against 1.23 in Fiji as of 2025.
What is the difference in justified political positions score between Fiji and Vanuatu?
0.03, with Vanuatu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Vanuatu?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Fiji and Vanuatu rank globally for justified political positions score?
Fiji ranks 55th and Vanuatu ranks 52nd of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Justified Political Positions Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Justified Political Positions Score
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,802 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which political elites provide complex, nuanced, and complete justifications for their views when considering important policy changes.