Equatorial Guinea vs Palestine, State of: Justified Political Positions Score
Equatorial Guinea
-1.82
in 2025
Palestine, State of
-1.95
in 1948
Equatorial Guinea rank
166th
Palestine, State of rank
168th
Justified Political Positions Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports -1.82 against -1.95 in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.13.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 166th and Palestine, State of ranks 168th of 175 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | -1.82 | -1.95 | 0.133 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1920s | -1.82 | -1.95 | 0.133 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1930s | -1.82 | -1.95 | 0.133 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1940s | -1.82 | -1.95 | 0.133 | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher justified political positions score, Equatorial Guinea or Palestine, State of?
- Equatorial Guinea, at -1.82 against -1.95 in Palestine, State of as of 2025.
- What is the difference in justified political positions score between Equatorial Guinea and Palestine, State of?
- 0.13, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Palestine, State of?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 1948.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Palestine, State of rank globally for justified political positions score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 166th and Palestine, State of ranks 168th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Justified Political Positions Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites provide complex, nuanced, and complete justifications for their views when considering important policy changes.