Denmark vs Mauritius: Justified Political Positions Score
Denmark
2.2
in 2025
Mauritius
2.18
in 2025
Denmark rank
14th
Mauritius rank
15th
Justified Political Positions Score over time
- Denmark
- Mauritius
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 2.2 against 2.18 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.02.
Across all 126 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.
Denmark ranks 14th and Mauritius ranks 15th of 175 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 1.78 | 0.553 | 1.22 | Denmark |
| 1910s | 1.85 | 0.553 | 1.3 | Denmark |
| 1920s | 1.85 | 0.553 | 1.3 | Denmark |
| 1930s | 1.85 | 0.553 | 1.3 | Denmark |
| 1940s | 1.21 | 0.553 | 0.6585 | Denmark |
| 1950s | 1.9 | 0.6282 | 1.27 | Denmark |
| 1960s | 2.56 | 1.15 | 1.41 | Denmark |
| 1970s | 2.56 | 2.02 | 0.539 | Denmark |
| 1980s | 2.56 | 2.02 | 0.539 | Denmark |
| 1990s | 2.56 | 2.02 | 0.539 | Denmark |
| 2000s | 2.59 | 2.33 | 0.2547 | Denmark |
| 2010s | 2.56 | 1.84 | 0.7141 | Denmark |
| 2020s | 2.17 | 1.49 | 0.676 | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher justified political positions score, Denmark or Mauritius?
- Denmark, at 2.2 against 2.18 in Mauritius as of 2025.
- What is the difference in justified political positions score between Denmark and Mauritius?
- 0.02, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Mauritius?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Denmark and Mauritius rank globally for justified political positions score?
- Denmark ranks 14th and Mauritius ranks 15th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Justified Political Positions Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites provide complex, nuanced, and complete justifications for their views when considering important policy changes.