Czechia vs Spain: Justified Political Positions Score

Czechia
1.16
in 2025
Spain
1.15
in 2025
Czechia rank
58th
Spain rank
59th

Justified Political Positions Score over time

  • Czechia
  • Spain
-2-10123190019622025

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 1.16 against 1.15 in Spain, a difference of 0.01.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Czechia ahead.

Czechia ranks 58th and Spain ranks 59th of 175 countries.

Across the 12 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 4 and Spain in 8.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Spain Difference Ahead
1910s 1.03 -0.498 1.53 Czechia
1920s 1.03 -0.9893 2.02 Czechia
1930s 0.4386 0.2152 0.2234 Czechia
1940s -1.48 -1.05 0.4378 Spain
1950s -1.8 -1.05 0.7532 Spain
1960s -1.54 -1.05 0.4893 Spain
1970s -1.63 -0.033 1.6 Spain
1980s -1.48 1.98 3.46 Spain
1990s 1.54 1.94 0.3976 Spain
2000s 1.39 2.06 0.6672 Spain
2010s 1.13 1.71 0.5783 Spain
2020s 1.53 1.34 0.1857 Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher justified political positions score, Czechia or Spain?
Czechia, at 1.16 against 1.15 in Spain as of 2025.
What is the difference in justified political positions score between Czechia and Spain?
0.01, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Spain?
108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
How do Czechia and Spain rank globally for justified political positions score?
Czechia ranks 58th and Spain ranks 59th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Justified Political Positions Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Justified Political Positions Score
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,802 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which political elites provide complex, nuanced, and complete justifications for their views when considering important policy changes.