Cuba vs Madagascar: Justified Political Positions Score
Cuba
0.036
in 2025
Madagascar
0
in 2025
Cuba rank
119th
Madagascar rank
122nd
Justified Political Positions Score over time
- Cuba
- Madagascar
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0.036 against 0 in Madagascar, a difference of 0.036.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 124 shared years of data; in 1902 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 119th and Madagascar ranks 122nd of 175 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | -0.326 | -2.42 | 2.09 | Cuba |
| 1910s | -0.326 | -2.42 | 2.09 | Cuba |
| 1920s | -0.6025 | -2.42 | 1.82 | Cuba |
| 1930s | -0.5106 | -2.42 | 1.91 | Cuba |
| 1940s | 0.114 | -2.42 | 2.53 | Cuba |
| 1950s | -0.6816 | -2.4 | 1.72 | Cuba |
| 1960s | 0.174 | -0.4307 | 0.6047 | Cuba |
| 1970s | 0.174 | -0.8573 | 1.03 | Cuba |
| 1980s | 0.174 | -1.65 | 1.83 | Cuba |
| 1990s | 0.174 | -0.592 | 0.766 | Cuba |
| 2000s | 0.1926 | 0.1309 | 0.0617 | Cuba |
| 2010s | 0.236 | -0.1394 | 0.3754 | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0.1693 | 0 | 0.1693 | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher justified political positions score, Cuba or Madagascar?
- Cuba, at 0.036 against 0 in Madagascar as of 2025.
- What is the difference in justified political positions score between Cuba and Madagascar?
- 0.036, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Madagascar?
- 124 years are reported by both, from 1902 to 2025.
- How do Cuba and Madagascar rank globally for justified political positions score?
- Cuba ranks 119th and Madagascar ranks 122nd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Justified Political Positions Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites provide complex, nuanced, and complete justifications for their views when considering important policy changes.