Cuba vs Gabon: Justified Political Positions Score

Cuba
0.036
in 2025
Gabon
0.004
in 2025
Cuba rank
119th
Gabon rank
121st

Justified Political Positions Score over time

  • Cuba
  • Gabon
-202190219632025

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 0.036 against 0.004 in Gabon, a difference of 0.032.

That makes Cuba's figure about 9.0 times Gabon's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 116 shared years of data; in 1910 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 119th and Gabon ranks 121st of 175 countries.

Across the 12 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 5 and Gabon in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Gabon Difference Ahead
1910s -0.326 -2.67 2.35 Cuba
1920s -0.6025 -2.67 2.07 Cuba
1930s -0.5106 -2.67 2.16 Cuba
1940s 0.114 -2.12 2.23 Cuba
1950s -0.6816 -0.368 0.3136 Gabon
1960s 0.174 0.9107 0.7367 Gabon
1970s 0.174 0.948 0.774 Gabon
1980s 0.174 0.948 0.774 Gabon
1990s 0.174 1.88 1.71 Gabon
2000s 0.1926 1.98 1.79 Gabon
2010s 0.236 1.39 1.16 Gabon
2020s 0.1693 0.0535 0.1158 Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher justified political positions score, Cuba or Gabon?
Cuba, at 0.036 against 0.004 in Gabon as of 2025.
What is the difference in justified political positions score between Cuba and Gabon?
0.032, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Gabon?
116 years are reported by both, from 1910 to 2025.
How do Cuba and Gabon rank globally for justified political positions score?
Cuba ranks 119th and Gabon ranks 121st of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Justified Political Positions Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Justified Political Positions Score
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,802 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which political elites provide complex, nuanced, and complete justifications for their views when considering important policy changes.