Croatia vs Niger: Justified Political Positions Score

Croatia
1.29
in 2025
Niger
1.36
in 2025
Croatia rank
50th
Niger rank
49th

Justified Political Positions Score over time

  • Croatia
  • Niger
-4-202192219732025

How they compare

Niger currently reports 1.36 against 1.29 in Croatia, a difference of 0.07.

That makes Niger's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 85 shared years of data; in 1941 it was Niger ahead.

Croatia ranks 50th and Niger ranks 49th of 175 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 5 and Niger in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Niger Difference Ahead
1940s -1.88 -0.827 1.05 Niger
1950s -0.5456 -0.879 0.3334 Croatia
1960s 0.085 -0.687 0.772 Croatia
1970s 0.085 -0.5422 0.6272 Croatia
1980s 0.2368 -0.3283 0.5651 Croatia
1990s -0.7981 1.88 2.68 Niger
2000s 0.6284 1.25 0.6166 Niger
2010s 1.36 1.49 0.1367 Niger
2020s 1.32 1.23 0.0897 Croatia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher justified political positions score, Croatia or Niger?
Niger, at 1.36 against 1.29 in Croatia as of 2025.
What is the difference in justified political positions score between Croatia and Niger?
0.07, with Niger ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Niger?
85 years are reported by both, from 1941 to 2025.
How do Croatia and Niger rank globally for justified political positions score?
Croatia ranks 50th and Niger ranks 49th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Justified Political Positions Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Justified Political Positions Score
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,802 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which political elites provide complex, nuanced, and complete justifications for their views when considering important policy changes.