Congo vs Cuba: Justified Political Positions Score
Congo
0.01
in 2025
Cuba
0.036
in 2025
Congo rank
120th
Cuba rank
119th
Justified Political Positions Score over time
- Congo
- Cuba
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0.036 against 0.01 in Congo, a difference of 0.026.
That makes Cuba's figure about 3.6 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 123 shared years of data; in 1903 it was Cuba ahead.
Congo ranks 120th and Cuba ranks 119th of 175 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Cuba in 11.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | -2.02 | -0.326 | 1.69 | Cuba |
| 1910s | -2.02 | -0.326 | 1.69 | Cuba |
| 1920s | -2.02 | -0.6025 | 1.42 | Cuba |
| 1930s | -2.02 | -0.5106 | 1.51 | Cuba |
| 1940s | -1.91 | 0.114 | 2.02 | Cuba |
| 1950s | -1.33 | -0.6816 | 0.6494 | Cuba |
| 1960s | 0.2295 | 0.174 | 0.0555 | Congo |
| 1970s | -0.7951 | 0.174 | 0.9691 | Cuba |
| 1980s | -0.996 | 0.174 | 1.17 | Cuba |
| 1990s | 0.3956 | 0.174 | 0.2216 | Congo |
| 2000s | -0.294 | 0.1926 | 0.4866 | Cuba |
| 2010s | -0.2941 | 0.236 | 0.5301 | Cuba |
| 2020s | -0.115 | 0.1693 | 0.2843 | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher justified political positions score, Congo or Cuba?
- Cuba, at 0.036 against 0.01 in Congo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in justified political positions score between Congo and Cuba?
- 0.026, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Cuba?
- 123 years are reported by both, from 1903 to 2025.
- How do Congo and Cuba rank globally for justified political positions score?
- Congo ranks 120th and Cuba ranks 119th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Justified Political Positions Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites provide complex, nuanced, and complete justifications for their views when considering important policy changes.