Comoros vs Paraguay: Justified Political Positions Score
Comoros
-0.84
in 2025
Paraguay
-0.945
in 2025
Comoros rank
154th
Paraguay rank
157th
Justified Political Positions Score over time
- Comoros
- Paraguay
How they compare
Comoros currently reports -0.84 against -0.945 in Paraguay, a difference of 0.105.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 94 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Paraguay ahead.
Comoros ranks 154th and Paraguay ranks 157th of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 8 and Paraguay in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | -3.19 | -2.62 | 0.567 | Paraguay |
| 1910s | -3.07 | -2.62 | 0.4447 | Paraguay |
| 1940s | -1.99 | -1.92 | 0.0625 | Paraguay |
| 1950s | -1.87 | -2.35 | 0.4802 | Comoros |
| 1960s | -1.87 | -2.64 | 0.765 | Comoros |
| 1970s | -1.01 | -2.64 | 1.62 | Comoros |
| 1980s | -0.514 | -2.56 | 2.05 | Comoros |
| 1990s | 0.557 | -0.867 | 1.42 | Comoros |
| 2000s | 0.371 | -0.413 | 0.784 | Comoros |
| 2010s | 0.245 | -0.689 | 0.934 | Comoros |
| 2020s | -0.6118 | -0.695 | 0.0832 | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher justified political positions score, Comoros or Paraguay?
- Comoros, at -0.84 against -0.945 in Paraguay as of 2025.
- What is the difference in justified political positions score between Comoros and Paraguay?
- 0.105, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Paraguay?
- 94 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Comoros and Paraguay rank globally for justified political positions score?
- Comoros ranks 154th and Paraguay ranks 157th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Justified Political Positions Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites provide complex, nuanced, and complete justifications for their views when considering important policy changes.