Chad vs Romania: Justified Political Positions Score
Chad
-0.186
in 2025
Romania
-0.161
in 2025
Chad rank
132nd
Romania rank
130th
Justified Political Positions Score over time
- Chad
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports -0.161 against -0.186 in Chad, a difference of 0.025.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 106 shared years of data; in 1920 it was Romania ahead.
Chad ranks 132nd and Romania ranks 130th of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 5 and Romania in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | -2.23 | 0.194 | 2.42 | Romania |
| 1930s | -2.23 | -0.4578 | 1.77 | Romania |
| 1940s | -1.56 | -2.42 | 0.8597 | Chad |
| 1950s | -1.34 | -2.42 | 1.08 | Chad |
| 1960s | -0.383 | -2.1 | 1.72 | Chad |
| 1970s | -0.8111 | -2.44 | 1.62 | Chad |
| 1980s | -1.56 | -2.44 | 0.877 | Chad |
| 1990s | -0.5085 | 0.0754 | 0.5839 | Romania |
| 2000s | -0.424 | 0.313 | 0.737 | Romania |
| 2010s | -0.3757 | 0.8269 | 1.2 | Romania |
| 2020s | -0.186 | 0.1505 | 0.3365 | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher justified political positions score, Chad or Romania?
- Romania, at -0.161 against -0.186 in Chad as of 2025.
- What is the difference in justified political positions score between Chad and Romania?
- 0.025, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Romania?
- 106 years are reported by both, from 1920 to 2025.
- How do Chad and Romania rank globally for justified political positions score?
- Chad ranks 132nd and Romania ranks 130th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Justified Political Positions Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites provide complex, nuanced, and complete justifications for their views when considering important policy changes.