Chad vs Nepal: Justified Political Positions Score

Chad
-0.186
in 2025
Nepal
-0.203
in 2025
Chad rank
132nd
Nepal rank
133rd

Justified Political Positions Score over time

  • Chad
  • Nepal
-4-3-2-101190019622025

How they compare

Chad currently reports -0.186 against -0.203 in Nepal, a difference of 0.017.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 106 shared years of data; in 1920 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 132nd and Nepal ranks 133rd of 175 countries.

Across the 11 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 4 and Nepal in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Nepal Difference Ahead
1920s -2.23 -3.61 1.38 Chad
1930s -2.23 -3.61 1.38 Chad
1940s -1.56 -3.61 2.05 Chad
1950s -1.34 0.2076 1.55 Nepal
1960s -0.383 -0.4091 0.0261 Chad
1970s -0.8111 -0.673 0.1381 Nepal
1980s -1.56 -0.3418 1.22 Nepal
1990s -0.5085 1.21 1.72 Nepal
2000s -0.424 0.9102 1.33 Nepal
2010s -0.3757 0.8128 1.19 Nepal
2020s -0.186 -0.1332 0.0528 Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher justified political positions score, Chad or Nepal?
Chad, at -0.186 against -0.203 in Nepal as of 2025.
What is the difference in justified political positions score between Chad and Nepal?
0.017, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Nepal?
106 years are reported by both, from 1920 to 2025.
How do Chad and Nepal rank globally for justified political positions score?
Chad ranks 132nd and Nepal ranks 133rd of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Justified Political Positions Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Justified Political Positions Score
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,802 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which political elites provide complex, nuanced, and complete justifications for their views when considering important policy changes.