Cambodia vs Peru: Justified Political Positions Score
Cambodia
-0.499
in 2025
Peru
-0.267
in 2025
Cambodia rank
139th
Peru rank
136th
Justified Political Positions Score over time
- Cambodia
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports -0.267 against -0.499 in Cambodia, a difference of 0.232.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Peru ahead.
Cambodia ranks 139th and Peru ranks 136th of 175 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 2 and Peru in 11.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | -2.4 | -0.816 | 1.59 | Peru |
| 1910s | -2.4 | -0.816 | 1.59 | Peru |
| 1920s | -2.4 | -1.33 | 1.07 | Peru |
| 1930s | -2.4 | -0.9258 | 1.48 | Peru |
| 1940s | -2.4 | -1.25 | 1.15 | Peru |
| 1950s | -1.16 | -1.26 | 0.1008 | Cambodia |
| 1960s | -0.181 | -0.2724 | 0.0914 | Cambodia |
| 1970s | -2.19 | -0.905 | 1.29 | Peru |
| 1980s | -2.36 | 0.874 | 3.23 | Peru |
| 1990s | -0.2157 | -0.0058 | 0.2099 | Peru |
| 2000s | 0.096 | 1.07 | 0.9737 | Peru |
| 2010s | -0.0987 | 0.8356 | 0.9343 | Peru |
| 2020s | -0.6095 | -0.2235 | 0.386 | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher justified political positions score, Cambodia or Peru?
- Peru, at -0.267 against -0.499 in Cambodia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in justified political positions score between Cambodia and Peru?
- 0.232, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Peru?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Cambodia and Peru rank globally for justified political positions score?
- Cambodia ranks 139th and Peru ranks 136th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Justified Political Positions Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites provide complex, nuanced, and complete justifications for their views when considering important policy changes.