Brazil vs Moldova: Justified Political Positions Score
Brazil
1.62
in 2025
Moldova
1.6
in 2025
Brazil rank
37th
Moldova rank
38th
Justified Political Positions Score over time
- Brazil
- Moldova
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 1.62 against 1.6 in Moldova, a difference of 0.02.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 106 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 37th and Moldova ranks 38th of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 6 and Moldova in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | -0.467 | -1.41 | 0.9451 | Brazil |
| 1910s | -0.467 | -0.4555 | 0.0115 | Moldova |
| 1940s | 0.3766 | 0.2658 | 0.1108 | Brazil |
| 1950s | 0.82 | 0.2656 | 0.5544 | Brazil |
| 1960s | -0.2307 | 0.292 | 0.5227 | Moldova |
| 1970s | -0.3991 | 0.292 | 0.6911 | Moldova |
| 1980s | 0.1812 | 0.7613 | 0.5801 | Moldova |
| 1990s | 1.76 | 0.1869 | 1.57 | Brazil |
| 2000s | 2.25 | 0.0195 | 2.24 | Brazil |
| 2010s | 1.38 | 0.9363 | 0.4463 | Brazil |
| 2020s | 0.9708 | 1.75 | 0.7825 | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher justified political positions score, Brazil or Moldova?
- Brazil, at 1.62 against 1.6 in Moldova as of 2025.
- What is the difference in justified political positions score between Brazil and Moldova?
- 0.02, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Moldova?
- 106 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Brazil and Moldova rank globally for justified political positions score?
- Brazil ranks 37th and Moldova ranks 38th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Justified Political Positions Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites provide complex, nuanced, and complete justifications for their views when considering important policy changes.