Botswana vs Chad: Justified Political Positions Score
Botswana
-0.246
in 2025
Chad
-0.186
in 2025
Botswana rank
135th
Chad rank
132nd
Justified Political Positions Score over time
- Botswana
- Chad
How they compare
Chad currently reports -0.186 against -0.246 in Botswana, a difference of 0.06.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 106 shared years of data; in 1920 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 135th and Chad ranks 132nd of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 8 and Chad in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Chad | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | -1.96 | -2.23 | 0.27 | Botswana |
| 1930s | -1.96 | -2.23 | 0.27 | Botswana |
| 1940s | -1.96 | -1.56 | 0.3982 | Chad |
| 1950s | -1.96 | -1.34 | 0.614 | Chad |
| 1960s | -0.963 | -0.383 | 0.58 | Chad |
| 1970s | 0.525 | -0.8111 | 1.34 | Botswana |
| 1980s | 0.525 | -1.56 | 2.08 | Botswana |
| 1990s | 0.6152 | -0.5085 | 1.12 | Botswana |
| 2000s | 0.9272 | -0.424 | 1.35 | Botswana |
| 2010s | 0.8026 | -0.3757 | 1.18 | Botswana |
| 2020s | 0.4282 | -0.186 | 0.6142 | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher justified political positions score, Botswana or Chad?
- Chad, at -0.186 against -0.246 in Botswana as of 2025.
- What is the difference in justified political positions score between Botswana and Chad?
- 0.06, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Chad?
- 106 years are reported by both, from 1920 to 2025.
- How do Botswana and Chad rank globally for justified political positions score?
- Botswana ranks 135th and Chad ranks 132nd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Justified Political Positions Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites provide complex, nuanced, and complete justifications for their views when considering important policy changes.