Benin vs Georgia: Justified Political Positions Score
Benin
1.15
in 2025
Georgia
1.1
in 2025
Benin rank
60th
Georgia rank
62nd
Justified Political Positions Score over time
- Benin
- Georgia
How they compare
Benin currently reports 1.15 against 1.1 in Georgia, a difference of 0.05.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Benin ahead.
Benin ranks 60th and Georgia ranks 62nd of 175 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Benin averaged higher in 10 and Georgia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.46 | -1.41 | 1.87 | Benin |
| 1910s | 0.46 | -0.4555 | 0.9155 | Benin |
| 1920s | 0.46 | 0.5519 | 0.0919 | Georgia |
| 1930s | 0.46 | 0.2737 | 0.1863 | Benin |
| 1940s | 0.46 | 0.2658 | 0.1942 | Benin |
| 1950s | 0.46 | 0.2656 | 0.1944 | Benin |
| 1960s | 0.89 | 0.292 | 0.598 | Benin |
| 1970s | 0.5355 | 0.292 | 0.2435 | Benin |
| 1980s | 0.081 | 0.7613 | 0.6803 | Georgia |
| 1990s | 1.82 | -0.4609 | 2.28 | Benin |
| 2000s | 1.92 | 0.3104 | 1.61 | Benin |
| 2010s | 1.85 | 0.875 | 0.9746 | Benin |
| 2020s | 1.15 | 1.26 | 0.1063 | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher justified political positions score, Benin or Georgia?
- Benin, at 1.15 against 1.1 in Georgia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in justified political positions score between Benin and Georgia?
- 0.05, with Benin ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Georgia?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Benin and Georgia rank globally for justified political positions score?
- Benin ranks 60th and Georgia ranks 62nd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Justified Political Positions Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites provide complex, nuanced, and complete justifications for their views when considering important policy changes.