Austria vs Gambia: Justified Political Positions Score
Austria
1.24
in 2025
Gambia
1.28
in 2025
Austria rank
54th
Gambia rank
51st
Justified Political Positions Score over time
- Austria
- Gambia
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 1.28 against 1.24 in Austria, a difference of 0.04.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 101 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 54th and Gambia ranks 51st of 175 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 11 and Gambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.004 | -0.871 | 0.875 | Austria |
| 1920s | -0.2714 | -0.871 | 0.5996 | Austria |
| 1930s | -0.7171 | -0.871 | 0.1539 | Austria |
| 1940s | 0.102 | -0.722 | 0.824 | Austria |
| 1950s | 0.153 | -0.722 | 0.875 | Austria |
| 1960s | 0.6242 | -0.1853 | 0.8095 | Austria |
| 1970s | 1.04 | 0.098 | 0.9404 | Austria |
| 1980s | 1.48 | 0.098 | 1.39 | Austria |
| 1990s | 1.55 | -0.2679 | 1.82 | Austria |
| 2000s | 1.58 | -0.397 | 1.98 | Austria |
| 2010s | 1.68 | -0.0523 | 1.73 | Austria |
| 2020s | 1.24 | 1.28 | 0.043 | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher justified political positions score, Austria or Gambia?
- Gambia, at 1.28 against 1.24 in Austria as of 2025.
- What is the difference in justified political positions score between Austria and Gambia?
- 0.04, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Gambia?
- 101 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Austria and Gambia rank globally for justified political positions score?
- Austria ranks 54th and Gambia ranks 51st of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Justified Political Positions Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites provide complex, nuanced, and complete justifications for their views when considering important policy changes.