Austria vs Fiji: Justified Political Positions Score

Austria
1.24
in 2025
Fiji
1.23
in 2025
Austria rank
54th
Fiji rank
55th

Justified Political Positions Score over time

  • Austria
  • Fiji
-2-1012190019622025

How they compare

Austria currently reports 1.24 against 1.23 in Fiji, a difference of 0.01.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 101 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Austria ahead.

Austria ranks 54th and Fiji ranks 55th of 175 countries.

Across the 12 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 10 and Fiji in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Fiji Difference Ahead
1910s 0.004 -0.597 0.601 Austria
1920s -0.2714 -0.597 0.3256 Austria
1930s -0.7171 -0.597 0.1201 Fiji
1940s 0.102 -0.597 0.699 Austria
1950s 0.153 0.0785 0.0745 Austria
1960s 0.6242 0.368 0.2562 Austria
1970s 1.04 1.54 0.5056 Fiji
1980s 1.48 0.5087 0.9743 Austria
1990s 1.55 0.5598 0.9922 Austria
2000s 1.58 -0.0524 1.64 Austria
2010s 1.68 0.2205 1.46 Austria
2020s 1.24 1.01 0.2288 Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher justified political positions score, Austria or Fiji?
Austria, at 1.24 against 1.23 in Fiji as of 2025.
What is the difference in justified political positions score between Austria and Fiji?
0.01, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Fiji?
101 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
How do Austria and Fiji rank globally for justified political positions score?
Austria ranks 54th and Fiji ranks 55th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Justified Political Positions Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Justified Political Positions Score
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,802 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which political elites provide complex, nuanced, and complete justifications for their views when considering important policy changes.