Angola vs Nepal: Justified Political Positions Score
Angola
-0.236
in 2025
Nepal
-0.203
in 2025
Angola rank
134th
Nepal rank
133rd
Justified Political Positions Score over time
- Angola
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports -0.203 against -0.236 in Angola, a difference of 0.033.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 134th and Nepal ranks 133rd of 175 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 5 and Nepal in 8.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | -3.15 | -3.61 | 0.46 | Angola |
| 1910s | -3.15 | -3.61 | 0.46 | Angola |
| 1920s | -3.15 | -3.61 | 0.46 | Angola |
| 1930s | -3.15 | -3.61 | 0.46 | Angola |
| 1940s | -3.15 | -3.61 | 0.46 | Angola |
| 1950s | -3.15 | 0.2076 | 3.36 | Nepal |
| 1960s | -2.71 | -0.4091 | 2.3 | Nepal |
| 1970s | -1.39 | -0.673 | 0.721 | Nepal |
| 1980s | -1 | -0.3418 | 0.6622 | Nepal |
| 1990s | -1.12 | 1.21 | 2.33 | Nepal |
| 2000s | -0.7355 | 0.9102 | 1.65 | Nepal |
| 2010s | -0.4562 | 0.8128 | 1.27 | Nepal |
| 2020s | -0.1633 | -0.1332 | 0.0302 | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher justified political positions score, Angola or Nepal?
- Nepal, at -0.203 against -0.236 in Angola as of 2025.
- What is the difference in justified political positions score between Angola and Nepal?
- 0.033, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Nepal?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Angola and Nepal rank globally for justified political positions score?
- Angola ranks 134th and Nepal ranks 133rd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Justified Political Positions Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites provide complex, nuanced, and complete justifications for their views when considering important policy changes.