Afghanistan vs Palestine, State of: Justified Political Positions Score
Afghanistan
-1.52
in 2025
Palestine, State of
-1.95
in 1948
Afghanistan rank
165th
Palestine, State of rank
168th
Justified Political Positions Score over time
- Afghanistan
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports -1.52 against -1.95 in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.43.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Palestine, State of ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 165th and Palestine, State of ranks 168th of 175 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 3 and Palestine, State of in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | -2.14 | -1.95 | 0.192 | Palestine, State of |
| 1920s | -1.08 | -1.95 | 0.875 | Afghanistan |
| 1930s | -1.52 | -1.95 | 0.4266 | Afghanistan |
| 1940s | -1.4 | -1.95 | 0.547 | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher justified political positions score, Afghanistan or Palestine, State of?
- Afghanistan, at -1.52 against -1.95 in Palestine, State of as of 2025.
- What is the difference in justified political positions score between Afghanistan and Palestine, State of?
- 0.43, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Palestine, State of?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 1948.
- How do Afghanistan and Palestine, State of rank globally for justified political positions score?
- Afghanistan ranks 165th and Palestine, State of ranks 168th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Justified Political Positions Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites provide complex, nuanced, and complete justifications for their views when considering important policy changes.