What is the difference in judicial checks on government index between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Hong Kong, China?

0.033, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Hong Kong, China?

107 years are reported by both, from 1919 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Judicial Checks on Government Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Hong Kong, China: Judicial Checks on Government Index

Bosnia and Herzegovina

0.612

in 2025

Hong Kong, China

0.579

in 2025

Bosnia and Herzegovina rank

98th

Hong Kong, China rank

101st

Judicial Checks on Government Index over time

Bosnia and Herzegovina
Hong Kong, China

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0.612 against 0.579 in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.033.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times Hong Kong, China's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 107 shared years of data; in 1919 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 98th and Hong Kong, China ranks 101st of 176 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Bosnia and Herzegovina	Hong Kong, China	Difference	Ahead
1910s	0.296	0.877	0.581	Hong Kong, China
1920s	0.2971	0.877	0.5799	Hong Kong, China
1930s	0.2046	0.877	0.6724	Hong Kong, China
1940s	0.1911	0.8724	0.6813	Hong Kong, China
1950s	0.277	0.877	0.6	Hong Kong, China
1960s	0.3869	0.877	0.4901	Hong Kong, China
1970s	0.4378	0.877	0.4392	Hong Kong, China
1980s	0.4214	0.877	0.4556	Hong Kong, China
1990s	0.3847	0.8725	0.4878	Hong Kong, China
2000s	0.5827	0.862	0.2793	Hong Kong, China
2010s	0.5976	0.854	0.2564	Hong Kong, China
2020s	0.5702	0.6193	0.0492	Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher judicial checks on government index, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Hong Kong, China?: Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0.612 against 0.579 in Hong Kong, China as of 2025.
What is the difference in judicial checks on government index between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Hong Kong, China?: 0.033, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Hong Kong, China?: 107 years are reported by both, from 1919 to 2025.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Hong Kong, China rank globally for judicial checks on government index?: Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 98th and Hong Kong, China ranks 101st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Judicial Checks on Government Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Hong Kong, China: Judicial Checks on Government Index. Statizoid, drawing on V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/judicial-constraints-on-the-executive-index/bosnia-and-herzegovina/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/judicial-constraints-on-the-executive-index/bosnia-and-herzegovina/hong-kong-sar-china/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Hong Kong, China: Judicial Checks on Government Index</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Judicial Checks on Government Index
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage: 176 places, 29,297 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed: 28 August 2026

Central estimate of the extent to which the executive respects the constitution, complies with the judiciary and high courts, and higher and lower courts are independent.