Lithuania vs New Zealand: IPAC Dashboard indicators — Geothermal
Lithuania
0 Index
in 2025
New Zealand
5,619 Index
in 2025
Lithuania rank
6th
New Zealand rank
6th
IPAC Dashboard indicators — Geothermal over time
- Lithuania
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 5,619 Index against 0 Index in Lithuania, a difference of 5,619 Index.
Across all 36 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 6th and New Zealand ranks 6th of 13 groups.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 Index | 1,588 Index | 1,588 Index | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 2.72 Index | 2,041 Index | 2,038 Index | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 1.93 Index | 4,210 Index | 4,208 Index | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 0 Index | 5,080 Index | 5,080 Index | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ipac dashboard indicators — geothermal, Lithuania or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 5,619 Index against 0 Index in Lithuania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in ipac dashboard indicators — geothermal between Lithuania and New Zealand?
- 5,619 Index, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and New Zealand?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Lithuania and New Zealand rank globally for ipac dashboard indicators — geothermal?
- Lithuania ranks 6th and New Zealand ranks 6th of 13 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as IPAC Dashboard indicators — Geothermal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.