Georgia vs Chinese Taipei: IPAC Dashboard indicators — Geothermal
Georgia
16.64 Index
in 2025
Chinese Taipei
22.99 Index
in 2024
Georgia rank
27th
Chinese Taipei rank
26th
IPAC Dashboard indicators — Geothermal over time
- Georgia
- Chinese Taipei
How they compare
Chinese Taipei currently reports 22.99 Index against 16.64 Index in Georgia, a difference of 6.35 Index.
That makes Chinese Taipei's figure about 1.4 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chinese Taipei ahead.
Georgia ranks 27th and Chinese Taipei ranks 26th of 136 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 3 and Chinese Taipei in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Chinese Taipei | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 Index | 0.688 Index | 0.688 Index | Chinese Taipei |
| 2000s | 14.29 Index | 0 Index | 14.29 Index | Georgia |
| 2010s | 18.39 Index | 0.0652 Index | 18.33 Index | Georgia |
| 2020s | 16.4 Index | 14.77 Index | 1.63 Index | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ipac dashboard indicators — geothermal, Georgia or Chinese Taipei?
- Chinese Taipei, at 22.99 Index against 16.64 Index in Georgia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ipac dashboard indicators — geothermal between Georgia and Chinese Taipei?
- 6.35 Index, with Chinese Taipei ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Chinese Taipei?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Chinese Taipei rank globally for ipac dashboard indicators — geothermal?
- Georgia ranks 27th and Chinese Taipei ranks 26th of 136 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as IPAC Dashboard indicators — Geothermal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.