Croatia vs New Zealand: IPAC Dashboard indicators — Geothermal
Croatia
6.21 Index
in 2025
New Zealand
5,619 Index
in 2025
Croatia rank
5th
New Zealand rank
6th
IPAC Dashboard indicators — Geothermal over time
- Croatia
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 5,619 Index against 6.21 Index in Croatia, a difference of 5,613 Index.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 905.6 times Croatia's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 5th and New Zealand ranks 6th of 13 groups.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 Index | 1,588 Index | 1,588 Index | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 0.9698 Index | 2,041 Index | 2,040 Index | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 11.72 Index | 4,210 Index | 4,198 Index | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 29.1 Index | 5,080 Index | 5,050 Index | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ipac dashboard indicators — geothermal, Croatia or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 5,619 Index against 6.21 Index in Croatia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in ipac dashboard indicators — geothermal between Croatia and New Zealand?
- 5,613 Index, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and New Zealand?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and New Zealand rank globally for ipac dashboard indicators — geothermal?
- Croatia ranks 5th and New Zealand ranks 6th of 13 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as IPAC Dashboard indicators — Geothermal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.