Costa Rica vs Lithuania: IPAC Dashboard indicators — Geothermal
Costa Rica
1,328 Index
in 2025
Lithuania
0 Index
in 2025
Costa Rica rank
13th
Lithuania rank
11th
IPAC Dashboard indicators — Geothermal over time
- Costa Rica
- Lithuania
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 1,328 Index against 0 Index in Lithuania, a difference of 1,328 Index.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Lithuania ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 13th and Lithuania ranks 11th of 136 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 245.79 Index | 0 Index | 245.79 Index | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 747.75 Index | 2.72 Index | 745.03 Index | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 1,073 Index | 1.93 Index | 1,071 Index | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 1,305 Index | 0 Index | 1,305 Index | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ipac dashboard indicators — geothermal, Costa Rica or Lithuania?
- Costa Rica, at 1,328 Index against 0 Index in Lithuania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in ipac dashboard indicators — geothermal between Costa Rica and Lithuania?
- 1,328 Index, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Lithuania?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Costa Rica and Lithuania rank globally for ipac dashboard indicators — geothermal?
- Costa Rica ranks 13th and Lithuania ranks 11th of 136 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as IPAC Dashboard indicators — Geothermal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.